Snowman Cross Section (by lunchbreath) (via laughingsquid)

These movies side-by-side in my Netflix recommendations made me laugh pretty hard… yes I am sleep deprived, why do you ask?

Digital New Year’s Resolutions

For part of my (digital) New Year’s Resolutions this year, I decided to delete my accounts on social media services that I don’t use. (Although I would love to cut Facebook, that’s probably not going to happen.) I love trying out new social media goodies, but it’s impossible for me to keep up with all of them. So over the course of the year I am going to try and use the services I belong to, and if I don’t, they’re getting cut.

First on the list and certainly, definitely cut, is dailybooth, which I never use, find sort of narcissistic, and is pretty much just full of teenage cam whores and amateur porn (although really, what else would you expect). The rest of the list is, so far:

1. dailybooth
2. flickr
3. picplz
4. foursquare
5. posterous
6. flavors.me
7. google+
8. readernaut
9. goodreads
10. linkedin

Just got this for Christmas. Best present ever!

I’m sorry, what? Someone clearly thought they could lie their way outta this one…

Kellogg’s vice president of nutrition Lisa Sutherland told NPR that Honey Smacks are not marketed to kids and are “seldom eaten by them.”

Not marketed to kids? That would explain Dig’Em, the cereal’s cartoon frog mascot with the funky sideways baseball cap.

No, wait. The opposite.

(via Infographic of the Day - The Daily What)

A distressed bride attempts suicide in China after her fiance abruptly called off their marriage. (via The 45 Most Powerful Images Of 2011)

Fig. 1: Many, many highlighted documents open at once, as if I can read more than one thing at a time.

Fig. 2: Discarded cans of diet coke and an empty tea mug. Rather than reuse this mug, invevitably I will get a new one each time I decide I want a refill.

Fig. 3: Tea-bag disposed of by placing on a coaster. Stay classy.

Fig. 4: Soothing candle (does not help stay soothed).

Fig. 5: Reading glasses, removed to take picture.

Fig. 6: Notebook full of incomprehensible scribbles which I am attempting to turn into a paper.*

[Not pictured: Angsty, emo or indie music playing on the stereo; 15 Herseys Kisses wrappers hiding behind the computer screen.]

*Note that sometimes I can’t even read my own handwriting.

At the moment, lawyers at Facebook and Google and Microsoft have more power over the future of privacy and free expression than any king or president or Supreme Court justice. And we can’t rely simply on judges enforcing the existing Constitution to protect the values that the Framers took for granted.

Reblogged from Fastcompany (via nprfreshair)

Matt Caliman has designed a simple way to give electric wall outlets some personality with his Creative Outlet Stickers. (via Laughingsquid)

What’s in a name? (via Nedroid)

“Cattache, A Great Way To Let Your Cat Out of the Bag”

(via Laughingsquid)

I love muppets, and I love cupcakes. Lolipops I’m not so keen on. (via The Laughing Squid)

At first glance, thought the title of this book was The Impossible Dead Ian Rankin. This is why cover design is so important.

inventor of the smartphone, via Married to the Sea

Can you imagine a world without lawyers?

tehawesome:

“Hey guys, remember in 2006 when MySpace let you set your background image to any old ugly shit so it was harder to read everything? Let’s bring that back LOL.”

-Google, apparently

Marge: [gasps] Homer! You’ve got it set on “whore”.

…

Lisa: Dad, women won’t like being shot in the face.

Homer: Women will like what I tell them to like!

A well articulated article in Slate points out why Google+ has lost its chance to compete with Facebook

Google+ has lost its chance to compete with Facebook:

That launch-first, fix-it-later strategy has worked marvelously for Google in the past. Gmail didn’t match all of Microsoft Outlook’s features from the beginning—it didn’t even have a delete button—but the stuff it did have (lots of storage and fast search) was so compelling that people were willing to stick with it until it became the best email program in existence. In the same way, I switched to Chrome because it was faster than any other browser I’ve ever used—and I stuck with it even though it lacked add-ons or the ability to bookmark many tabs at once. (It has since added those features.)

But a social network isn’t a product; it’s a place. Like a bar or a club, a social network needs a critical mass of people to be successful—the more people it attracts, the more people it attracts. Google couldn’t have possibly built every one of Facebook’s features into its new service when it launched, but to make up for its deficits, it ought to have let users experiment more freely with the site. That freewheeling attitude is precisely how Twitter—the only other social network to successfully take on Facebook in the last few years—got so big. When Twitter users invented ways to reply to one another or echo other people’s tweets, the service didn’t stop them—it embraced and extended their creativity. This attitude marked Twitter as a place whose hosts appreciated its users, and that attitude—and all the fun people were having—pushed people to stick with the site despite its many flaws (Twitter’s frequent downtime, for example). Google+, by contrast, never managed to translate its initial surge into lasting enthusiasm. And for that reason, it’s surely doomed.